aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/review.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorB. Watson <urchlay@slackware.uk>2025-11-13 05:39:38 -0500
committerB. Watson <urchlay@slackware.uk>2025-11-13 05:39:38 -0500
commite2da2bffe58a76c091d3496bd3ca2d2f18ea2eb6 (patch)
tree5195b221457842d781fadcb94331c93058046744 /doc/review.txt
downloadunalf-e2da2bffe58a76c091d3496bd3ca2d2f18ea2eb6.tar.gz
initial commit
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/review.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/review.txt44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/review.txt b/doc/review.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f56e4c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/review.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+The following review was published in the Atari H.A.C.K. magazine,
+in the August 1988 issue (Volume II, Issue IIX) [1]:
+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
+Those of us who are experienced telecommunicators are quite familiar
+with the ARC family of disk file compression programs. The most
+widely used of the 8-bit versions of the ARC program has been,
+and remains to be, ARC version 1.2 (the archiver) and ARCX version
+1.2 (the dearchiver). Two very excellent programs written in C by
+Ralph Walden of the Atari Computer Enthusiasts of Eugene, aka ACE.
+Almost every BBS worth its salt uses this program to compress its
+files not only to make them take up less space, but also to save time
+on file transfers. A smaller program simply takes less time to send
+or receive. Of course, since the file is compressed, or archived, it
+isn't runnable until it's dearced with the ARCX program.
+
+ARC and ARCX are great programs but they have their small problems.
+They are slow and sometimes show unexplainable CRC errors when
+dearcing. This frustrates and detracts from what is otherwise a great
+program. There was none better, that is, until now.
+
+ALFCRUNCH is here. Despite its cute name it has nothing to do with
+the furry wise guy from the planet Melmac. ALFCRUNCH consists of two
+programs, LZ.COM, the archiver, and DZ.COM, the dearchiver. Files are
+manipulated the same way as the ARC programs do it but they are not
+compatible. The LZ program compresses programs slightly more than does
+ARC.COM, or anywhere from a few percent to almost 70%, all depending
+on file type and save method used. The DZ program works as claimed-
+there isn't much to say except that it works. All of this sounds good
+but so what? Why change for a few percent?
+
+The reason to change is speed. ALF programs are at least 10 times
+faster than the ARC programs. Sometimes they are even quicker!
+Programs which may have taken several minutes to process are done
+in seconds with ALF. In fact the first time I tried ALF I thought it
+didn't work... but it does! Reason enough to change? Not yet? Well,
+ALF is free. Get it from your club PD library or download it from
+SLOWPOKE! [2]
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+[1] The full issue of HACK can be found here:
+ https://archive.org/details/AtariHACKNewsAugust1988
+
+[2] SLOWPOKE was an Atari BBS in the Salem/Portland, Oregon area.